Agency Execs Focus On Voice For Brand EngagementAs messaging capabilities expand within the Internet of Things, voice appears to be a primary focus for new brand engagement opportunities.
That was the general consensus from a panel discussion of agency executives at the annual MediaPost IoT Marketing Forum in New York this week.
While some potential challenges of the screen-less medium were outlined, the group seemed to agree that voice opens up new doors for brands and consumers.
As the volume and speed of information transmitted between users and the brands serving them personalized experiences increases, touch input is becoming a limiting factor for efficiency, said Leigh Christie, manager of the Isobar U.S. NowLab.
A need for efficiency in user input is one of the reasons for moving toward voice as a medium, according to Christie. “What’s really driving this all forward right now is that we’re all getting sick of flapping our meat sticks,” Christie said. “Bandwidth-wise, connecting to artificial intelligence, connecting to our phones, if you flap your fingers on the screen, you can only input so much information so quickly.”
Christie said that personalized brand experiences are increasingly requiring more bandwidth of data, both on the user input and brand experience sides. On the brand side, utilizing data from external sensors and other devices around consumers can provide context to the primary form of communication. That augmenting of communication increases bandwidth, according to Christie.
“You definitely see that with voice,” he said. “Output is much faster, bandwidth is much faster with voice.”
However, using voice is inherently different than screen-based communication in certain regards and can create new challenges for brands and advertisers, according to Michael Miraflor, senior vice president and global head of Futures and Innovation at Blue 449.
“It’s not the same as a search result where you’re going to get five or 10 organic results and chose from that,” Miraflor said. “The system will have to know exactly what you want because you’re not going to want to have a conversation to pick from 10 different products.”
The solution is to combine voice with some level of artificial intelligence on the back-end to deliver high-quality, personalized results.
“Knowing that there are no visual cues, it’s going to be reliant on past purchase data, it’s going to be reliant on all the other data that it uses to come to the conclusion of ‘this is what you want,’” Miraflor said. “That’s a huge challenge for brands because it takes away a certain amount of consumer choice.”
Merging AI and voice also seemed to be a focus of more than one other discussion and presentation throughout the event.
In addition to the dynamics of designing the user experience of voice interactions, the group discussed where these interactions are taking place. The context was mostly centered around the use of digital voice assistants in the home, such as Amazon’s Echo and Google’s Home.
In practice, leveraging voice through devices like Amazon’s Echo is currently an added-value approach for brands to extend their presence into a consumer’s pre-existing platform, requiring users who own and use the device, according to Chuck Fletcher, technology director, emerging experiences, at SapientRazorfish.
“The real opportunity for brands with Alexa is somebody that already has a solid relationship and it lets you go even further,” Fletcher said. “It’s not necessarily a place you’re going to expose yourself to brand new customers, because the behavior of actually saying ‘enable X’ and then actually start using that thing is a pretty hard sell.”
These devices and other connected products in the home can provide a close integration of a brand in a consumer’s life. However, that opportunity requires a more sensitive approach, according to Sara Bamossy, chief strategy officer at Pitch.
“I think that home is a new frontier for messaging or advertising, but we kind of have to change how we think about CTAs,” Bamossy said. “We can’t be so assertive because that makes people feel like they’ve lost control.”
“You don’t want to be saying things like ‘buy now,’ that’s too aggressive,” she said. “You want to be saying things like ‘here’s a suggestion’ or ‘here’s a hint of something you might be interested in’ or ‘now might be a good time to buy.’”
Of the four agency executives, two said they prefer Amazon’s Alexa platform (Amazon Echo devices) over Google’s Assistant (Google Home) and two said they are undecided.
This article was originally published in MediaPost.